Search for legal lead generation companies and you get a list of businesses that describe themselves in almost identical language and do not do the same job. Some of them run your advertising. Some of them sell you a contact. Some of them sell the same contact to three other firms. Some of them do not charge until a case signs.
Those are four different businesses with four different risk profiles, and the marketing pages do not distinguish them. This is a guide to telling them apart before you sign, and to the questions that get a straight answer out of any of them.
The four models
1. The agency that runs your advertising
You pay a management fee, and separately you pay Google or Meta for the media. The leads are yours from the first click because the account is yours. The upside is that you own the asset: the campaign history, the conversion data, and the account itself. The downside is that you are carrying the media risk, and in personal injury that risk is expensive. Competitive accident terms routinely clear high double digit costs per click, and a campaign that is still learning burns real money before it produces a signed case.
This suits a firm with the budget to absorb a learning period and the intent to build something durable.
2. The exclusive lead seller
You pay per lead, and that lead goes to you alone. Price per lead is higher than any shared product and the economics are usually better anyway, because you are not racing three other firms to the phone. The thing to verify is what exclusive means in the contract. Exclusive to you, or exclusive to you within your market, or exclusive for a number of days after which it is resold, are three different promises and only one of them is the one you think you bought.
3. The shared marketplace
The same enquiry is sold to several firms at once, often through a ping and post auction that decides the buyer in under a second. The per lead price is low and the conversion rate is lower, sometimes dramatically. A claimant contacted by four firms in ten minutes gets annoyed, and the firm that called first usually wins on nothing but speed.
Shared can work, but only for a firm with the intake capacity to call inside a minute, every time, including evenings and weekends. Without that, a cheap shared lead is the most expensive kind.
4. Pay per signed case
You pay nothing until a case signs a retainer. The number sounds alarming next to a per lead price, because it is the cost of a case rather than the cost of a contact, and the two are not comparable. What you are buying is the removal of volume risk: no spend on leads that never convert. What you give up is margin on the cases that would have signed cheaply, and you should read the definition of a signed case very carefully, particularly around cases that later drop.
Before you compare two prices, find out which model each one is. A $95 lead and a $1,900 case and a $6,000 monthly retainer are not three quotes for the same thing. Most of the disappointment in this category comes from comparing a number in one model to a number in another.
The questions that separate a serious operator from a reseller
Where does the lead come from?
A company that runs its own campaigns can tell you the channel, the state and the intent of the enquiry. If the answer is vague, you are probably buying re-sold inventory, and re-sold inventory is older than it looks.
What consent does the claimant give, and can you produce it?
This is the question with legal consequences attached. Ask whether the claimant gave express written consent to be contacted, what the disclosure said at the moment they gave it, and whether the vendor can produce a record on demand for a specific lead. A company that cannot produce consent for a single lead cannot produce it for any of them, and TCPA exposure sits with the firm doing the calling. Our own TCPA and consent policy is published rather than described on request, which is the standard worth holding anyone to.
How fast do I get it, and in what form?
Speed to first contact is the single largest controllable variable in conversion for injury leads, and the decay is measured in minutes rather than hours. Ask whether leads arrive by direct API into your case management system, by webhook, or by an email you have to watch. Email delivery is a signal about the whole operation.
What is the credit policy, in writing?
Wrong state, wrong practice area, no injury, a duplicate of a lead you already bought, a disconnected number. Ask which of those are credited, within what window, and whether credits are cash or forced into future volume. A vendor unwilling to credit a lead that fails their own stated criteria is transferring their screening cost onto you and calling it a price.
What happens to a duplicate?
If the same claimant comes through twice, is it billed twice? A firm with a serious operation behind it will have an answer and it will be no.
Can I start small and scale?
Anyone confident in their product will let you buy a limited volume in one state and expand from there. A twelve month minimum on a first engagement is a statement about their retention rate, not about your commitment.
Who owns the data?
In an agency relationship, get it in writing that the ad account, the pixel data and the campaign history are yours if you leave. This is routinely the most valuable thing produced by twelve months of spend and it is routinely left in someone else's account.
Pricing, and how to read it honestly
| Model | What you pay for | Where the risk sits |
|---|---|---|
| Agency | Management fee plus your own media spend | With you. You carry the learning period. |
| Exclusive leads | Each contact, yours alone | Shared. You carry conversion, they carry generation. |
| Shared marketplace | Each contact, several buyers | Almost entirely with you. |
| Pay per signed case | Signed retainers only | With the vendor, and priced accordingly. |
The only number that settles an argument between these is cost per signed case, and you cannot calculate it from a rate card. It needs your own intake data: how many leads you contact, how fast, how many convert, and what a case is worth in your practice area. A firm that knows its cost per signed case can evaluate any of these four in an afternoon. A firm that does not will keep buying on lead price and keep being surprised. Our breakdown of cost per lead in personal injury walks through the arithmetic.
Red flags
- Guaranteed case volume. Nobody controls how many people are injured in your county this month.
- A price that will not itemise. Management fee and media spend are different things and both belong on the invoice.
- Vague answers about consent. The exposure lands on the firm, not the vendor.
- No credit policy in writing. A verbal credit policy is not one.
- A long minimum term on a first engagement. Ask what their average client tenure is and watch the answer.
- Leads by email only. In a channel where minutes decide conversion, this tells you what they think of speed.
What good actually looks like
A company worth working with will tell you which states it can serve and which it cannot, will show you the intake form the claimant actually filled in, will deliver by API into your system, will credit a lead that fails its own criteria without an argument, and will let you start in one state. None of that is exotic. It is simply what an operation with its own campaigns can do and a reseller cannot.
If you are earlier in this than the buying decision, our guide to getting more personal injury leads covers the channels themselves, and exclusive versus shared runs the conversion arithmetic that decides which of the four models fits your intake.
See What the Demand Looks Like in Your State
Legal Leadz AI runs exclusive lead campaigns for injury firms across the US. Tell us your state and practice mix and we will show you the volume, the cost and what your intake would need to handle it.
Get My Free Market Analysis →